Does “Barr. Alfred Johnson” even understand the meaning of the word “accost”? I guess it’s possible that one can be “accosted” via scam e-mail. He admits to being dishonest, and excuses it by more or less saying, “I can’t help it”. Of course he has no “late/deceased client” and there is no money. The only money involved here is YOURS, and the dishonest lawyer wants to lay claim to it. He will do this by charging you fees. And he’ll keep coming back for more until you have nothing to give him, then he’ll abscond, leaving you holding the proverbial bag. If you receive this, delete it and don’t reply. Hopefully, in the not-so-distant future, the police will “accost” him—in person.
Wednesday, September 9, 2009 1:24 PM
From:
"Barr. Alfred Johnson" info@bruneiembassy.org
To:
la_black_roze@yahoo.com
Dear Friend,
I wish to accost you (Unhand me, you fool! Lol!) with a request that would be of immense benefit to both of us. Being an executor of wills, it is possible that we may be tempted to make fortune out of our client's situations, when we cannot help it, or left with no better option.
The issue I am presenting to you is a case of my client who willed a fortune to his next-of-kin. It was most unfortunate that he and his next-of-kin died on the same day in the Sharja plane crash of Tuesday 10 February 2004. I am now faced with confusion of who to pass the fortune to.
According to the English law, the fortune is supposed to be bequeathed to the government. However, I don't belong to that school of thought which proposes that the fortune of unlucky people be given to the government.
My purpose of contacting you is to seek your acting as the beneficiary of the will, and lay claim the legacy of �7.9 million, which this unfortunate client of mine bequeathed to his next-of-kin. For now, I alone know about his will, as my client has great confidence in me. Everything will be left between you and I. The share would be 45% for you and 55% for me. I would want to take care of the needy and less privileged, as this is my primary objective. All I have to do is amend the will to make you the beneficiary to the �7.9 million legacy.
Again, I feel that you may apprehensive and consider this amount too big for you to defend. It does not matter, as there are documents to back it up. This is a legacy being passed on to a next-of-kin. As I am not very sure of getting your consent on the issue I prefer not to divulge my full identity so as not to risk being disbarred. The English Bar considers it a breach of the oath of the English Bar. I need not emphasize to you that the sensitivity of this issue need not be toyed with by neglecting its confidentiality. I therefore appeal to you not discuss this request with anybody, even if you decline my request. (Sorry, "Barr". I'm blowing the whistle on your dirty little secret!)
Until I am sure of your consent and full cooperation, I would prefer that we maintain correspondence by email.
At this point I want to assure you that your true consent, full cooperation and confidentiality are all that are required for us to take full advantage of this opportunity.
I look forward to hearing from you soon with a letter of acceptance stating your full names, recent contact address, telephone/fax number,occupation,age and your company name together with any form of ID and i want you to know both of us will share the cost in the process of the transaction.
Yours truly,
Barr. Alfred Johnson.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment